The quality and state of being literate is
all beyond the knowledge of letters. It elevates the conceptualized knowledge
into judicious and timely actions. A literate person is an empowered individual
who can revisit, revise and apply the acquired skill and knowledge when he has
to enter the mode of activity. Formal and informal modes of education
contribute to the literacy of a person. Our ancient educational tradition was
notable for its pragmatic edge incorporated with its theoretical learning. It
was the Gurukula system, where the
literacy acquired was simultaneously practiced for the well being of oneself
and the world around.
From the basic levels of a social life
where a salty soup prepared by one, is made better by the advice of another to
add a potato or two, showcases literacy at work. The knowledge of a ‘laadan’ (local doctor) which improves
the health and saves the lives in a village is another example for literacy in
action. In the first case we understand that it is common knowledge at work which
may be possessed by many folks around. But what makes the difference is the
mindset of that individual who earnestly identified the situation to convert
his/her knowledge into action and helped the other. This makes the individual
literate. In the second case where the specialised knowledge of medicine is at
work, we find the literacy of the ‘laadan’
works at the level of dedication, selflessness and compassion.
Today India has grown to a highly populous
state with difficulties in making all of its individuals literate. We have done
away with the indigenous educational practices and in the British introduced
system of education our children strive to make giant leaps in acquiring
knowledge. When knowledge is counted in quantity and individual merits as
grades they mistake themselves to be literate individuals as they finish their
schooling. But do such literates be any useful to the society they live
in? In this part of the world, acquired
literacy if unused, can be considered a crime to the fellow being, as knowledge
had get round the unfortunate many to reach the lucky. It is obvious that the country needs literacy
in action and the literates to guide others. These days we see Anna Hasare’s
literacy in action when he uses his intelligence to understand the flaws in the
existing system of governance and his acquired knowledge of the Gandhian
philosophies to protest against it. He becomes literate when he is articulating
the truths of corruption in independent India which is around Rs
910603234300000 to the common man who might not even be educated to know what
to call such a big numeral. Thus
literacy also works as a bridge to connect knowledge to the less privileged. We
can find splendour in his work when this man has empowered people to
judiciously connect Gandhian philosophy from another era to a present problem
and bridge the gap between time-spaces and knowledge.
Thus the ability of literacy to work at
different levels is its beauty and charm. Its power to cut barriers bridge
lives and empower the community is what defines the quality and state of being
literate, which is all beyond the knowledge of letters.
Some thoughts on your post:
ReplyDelete- I like the idea here that to be literate is to apply knowledge meaningfully, to empower the individual within a context of others.
- I like the connection between revisiting and revising. Revision is, truly, re-envisioning how a text works or how an experience can be improved or refined for the next like experience.
- Sounds like the Gurukula system is one that you're working on in your dissertation. Makes good sense. Getting back to that system may be more pragmatic for a postcolonial India.
- Good examples of how people can convert their knowledge into action and definitive steps and tools.
- You're right in that literacy is often used in selfish ways, but can and should be used for the good of others.
- I like that you are working on ideas here in the course that pertain, very well, to those of your larger work with your dissertation, Martin. And thanks for sharing that with me; I'll read it closely and carefully, and maybe I can help bounce ideas around with you, Rizio, and others.
Martin,
ReplyDeleteUr reference 2 gurukula system of education s gud.i think this pactice could help 4 the overall development of a student................
literacy help 2 revise our life........nice point
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletehi martin.. the associations with gurukula system and ladaan are thought provoking.theory with practise is the key. but gurukula system was not an inclusive project. Everybody who wish to get educated may not find an entry in a gurukula. but the privileged few will. Same is the case with the present because quality education is not universal..
ReplyDeleteanna's movement against corruption is finally seeing the light of the day according to newspaper reports. His fight against corruption is a compelling story for our times. How he could bring together different people from different streams like the two Bhushans, bedi, kejrival etc under one umbrella is interesting. But i feel if it was not for his Gandhian aura, he would have lost it halfway. Congress even now finds it difficult to deal with Gandhi.
But there are interesting questions raised by Kalpana Sharma, Arundhati roy worth consideration. why Irom Sharmila's campaign against Armed Forces Special Powers Act does not generate discussion in the public sphere like Anna's did. what is the charactar of the proposed Lokpall, whether it is inherently autocratic going against the democratic spirit of India? While i am writing this i get a call from another citizen of this country who angrily asks “who is he to challenge the Indian parliament, democratically elected representatives of this country?”